Not sure what you’d like? Have a look at these historical typologies and archeological finds.

Europe.

Roman Antiquity 500 BC - 500 AD

Classical antiquity dates far prior into 800 BC however I am choosing to start this section coinciding with the end of the Iron age and the start of the roman republic.

Roman

Prof. Dr. Günther Schörner., Boris, Mijat. 2012. Studien zu nichtrömischen Elementen in der römischen Bewaffnung am Beispiel des gladius Hispaniensis (Mag.-Arbeit)

Christian Miks, 2007. Studien zur römischen Schwertbewaffnung in der Kaiserzeit, Volume 1. Kölner Studien zur Archäologie der römischen Provinzen, ISSN 0945-2893.

Marcin Biborkis and Jørgen Ilkjær., 2006. Illerup Ådal Volume 11-12: Die Schwerter und Die Schwertscheiden. Katalog, Tafeln und Fundlisten", Jutland Archaeological Society Publications.

M.C.Bishop and J.C.N.Coulston 2006. Roman Military Equipment from the Punic Wars to the Fall of Rome, second edition

The Roman Military Museum

Roman Weapons Pilum / Lance / Spear / Catapult / Plumbata / Catapult points

Roman Offensive Weapons: The Sword (Gladius and Spatha)

Hedemünden finds at the museum of Northeim, 2009.

The British Meauseum

Germanic

Faculty of Engineering - Kiel - Germany, Iron, Steel and Swords

FoE- Kiel Germany. Germanic Northern Sword types of the first millennium

FoE - Kiel Germany. Background to Celtic swords

B. Kontny. 2019. Axes from Lake Lubanowo (Pomerania, Poland) and Their Possible Function on the Background of Watery Finds of the Roman Period and Middle Ages

Fitzpatrick 2018. The finds from La Tène in the British Museum.

Radomir Pleiner 1993. The Celtic Sword; Clarendon Press, Oxford.

J. M. De Navarro 1972. The finds from the site of La Tène. Oxford University Press.

Drnić, I. 2012. La Tène spearheads from south-eastern Pannonia and the northern Balkans.

Vol 1/2 of QUESADA SANZ, F. (1997): El armamento ibérico. Estudio tipológico, geográfico, funcional, social y simbólico de las armas en la Cultura Ibérica (siglos VI-I a.C.). Monographies Instrumentum, 3, Montagnac. Ed. Monique Mergoil.

Vol 2/2 of F. Quesada-Sanz (1997) El armamento ibérico. Estudio tipológico, geográfico, funcional, social y simbólico de las armas en la Cultura ibérica (siglos Vl-1 a.C.). MOnpogr. Instrumentum, 3. Montagnac.

Thracian Rhomphaia Swords & sica discussion

1066 whos who index, Rhomphaia

Roman

Roman spatha’s where in part a response to the swords of the Germanic tribes, having similar blade types.

 
roman blade.jpg

Christian Miks, 2007. Studien zur römischen Schwertbewaffnung in der Kaiserzeit, Volume 1.

Tafel 15: Studien zu nichtrömischen Elementen in der römischen Bewaffnung am Beispiel des gladius Hispaniensis (Mag.-Arbeit)

This one was horrendous to track down references for, Christian Miks publication is fairly recent and definitely still in print but for some reason this illustration isn’t properly credited to him when found in the wild…

Drawings from Roman Military Equipment by Bishop & Coulston, Edition 2, 2006 © M.C. Bishop

Marcin Biborkis & Jørgen Ilkjær, 2006 gladius & spatha hilts

Roman Pilum http://www.romancoins.info/MilitaryEquipment-spear.html

source needed, basic components and construction of a late roman pillum.

Roman axes are mainly infantry kit tools for entrenchment and fortification. Although I highly suspect they would have been used in battle if absolutely necessary, such as in the case of ambush.

Germanic

La Tene sword hilts where mostly wood with metal bolsters, as such most handle reconstructions are speculative

sword_types_overview.png

Marcin Biborkis and Jørgen Ilkjær., 2006 Germanic sword types

Fernando Quesada Sanz., 1997 falcata/khopis types

Also seen in greece

 
celtsword_la_tene.jpg

J. M. De Navarro 1972. The finds from the site of La Tène.

Lindholmgård Mose sword archived in Copenhagen, total length 85 Cm / 33 inches http://myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.31559.html

Lindholmgård Mose sword archived in Copenhagen, total length 85 Cm / 33 inches

important note: scabbard throat is the left end matching the hilt shape.

Drnić, I. 2012. La Tène spearhead typology

 

Drnić, I. 2012. La Tène spearbutt typology

Roman period adze & axes found in Poland. Kontny. 2019. 179.

 

Migration era 350 AD - 800 AD

The migration era can be considered a intermediary period between the fall of the western roman empire; subsequent resettlement of former roman territories by the Germanic peoples of western Europe and the beginning of the Viking age. Ironically this period of deromanization sees the beginning of the culture shift towards a Roman Catholic Europe which so strongly characterized the differences between Scandinavians & the Anglo-Saxon / Frankish kingdoms of the later Viking age.

Outside of sword hilts Migration Era typologies have a lot of overlap with those of the Germanic Roman wars & the early Viking age. late Migration typologies are often topologized with finds from the Viking age proper, where earlier types are seen with those of late antiquity.

As such this section is fairly brief. See the works of Jan Petersen 1919 & Kirpichnikov 1966 in the next section for the most common late migration era spears and axes.

Andrea Biondi. 2021. Lombard weapons from Fiesole, Tuscany (6th – 7th century C.E.): old archaeological data for new considerations / Langobardsko orožje iz Fiesole v Toskani (6.–7. stoletje n. št.): stari arheološki podatki za nove razmisleke

Aläxander van't Land. 2013. The Merovingian "Franciscas": asymmetrical axes corresponding to throwing axes?

A . S. Dobat 2005. The king and his cult: the axe-hammer from Sutton Hoo and its implications for the concept of sacral leadership in early medieval Europe

Nørgård Jørgensen, A. 1999. Weapon chronology in Southern Scandinavia in Late Iron Age - Merovingian Period - Vendel Period.

Nørgård Jørgensen, A. 1992. Weapon sets in Gotlandic grave finds from 530-800 AD. A chronological Analysis. In Chronological Studies of Anglo-Saxon England, Lombard Italy and Vendel Period Sweden.

K. Böhner. 1986. «German chwerter des 5./6. Jahrhunderts» (Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen zentralmuseums, Mainz, 1986-2)

Elis Behmer 1939 Das zweischneidige Schwert der Völkerwanderungszeit

Engelhardt, 1865. Nydam mosefund 1859-1863

Migration Period Swords and Fancy Hilts & Pommels

Merovingian axe head

Essentially a continuation or evolution of the spatha into eventually what we would classify as a Viking age sword. The main difference being the laminate hilts comprised of riveted metal and organic materials, typically richly decorated.

behmer_classification_polish_small.png

Behmer 1939, migration era sword hilt typology

nydamvi.engelhardt.nydammos_528.jpg

Engelhardt., 1865 Nydam Mosefund

 
pyramid_pommel_timeline.png

https://www.tf.uni-kiel.de/matwis/amat/iss/kap_b/illustr/ib_3_5.html

migration period.png

Engelhardt., 1865 Nydam Mosefund

Aläxander van't Land. 2013; Böhner. 1986. Merovingian Francesca typology.

7th century; Sutton hoo iron hafted hammer axe (poleaxe) A . S. Dobat 2005. 881.

Poleaxes started as dedicated tools for animal slaughter, the Sutton hoo axe is hypothetically the oldest example of one from the British isles. By the late medieval period martial poleaxes where being made for knightly warfare.

Migration Era axes are lacking in proper typology but are generally best represented by Petersen types A, B, C & Kirpichnikov types I, II, III.

Engelhardt, 1866 migration era (tool?) axes.

IMG_2284.JPG

Jan Petersen, 1919 Axe typology 8-12th century.

The Viking age was a heyday for axe typologies; the increased proclivity of mail Armour increased the demand for heavier mass transfer weaponry than could still deal equally with lighter equipped opponents. The relatively cheap cost compared to swords of the period also contributed to their popularity among the opportunistic…

Chronology and typology of Viking age axes. Hjardar – Vike 2019: 163. Modified on Petersen & Kirpichnikov axe typology.

Anatoly Kirpichnikov 1966. axe typology Rus/Ukraine

B. Solberg, 1984 Norwegian Spear-heads from the Merovingian and Viking Periods

B. Solberg, 1984 Norwegian Spear-heads from the Merovingian and Viking Periods 7th - 11th century.

Spears are the most common dedicated military weapon of the Viking age, axes among the lower casts often met dual purposes and swords where status symbols of the most fortunate. However the spears purpose was for fighting and few men would ignore sage advice to brave the roads without their iron tipped walking staves.

Chronology and typology of viking age spears. Hjardar – Vike 2019: 174.

Chronology and typology of viking age sword hilts. Hjardar – Vike 2019: 169.

5d3005a7149e26bebe6662739af7a75f.jpg

Petersen, 1919 Hilt typology.

Additions to E. Oakeshott 1960. medieval sword typology from Southeastern Europe. M. Aleksić 2007: 28. (I, Ia, II.)

These three typologies while based on oakeshott’s work while contrasted with Giebig’s typology. Aleksić noted that Type II while closest to Oakeshott’s type X & Geibig type 4 exhibited hilt furniture that may date it to the 13th opposed to 10-11th centuries. Possibly a re-hilting of a earlier sword.

Type I & Ia are most closely reminiscent of Geibig type 1 with more noticeable taper, expected to be 9th-11th century forged in the byzantine style without fullers.

Swords of the Viking age are easily the most diverse typological group of weapons. Regional stylizations where rampant and the constant seafaring movement of trade and raids saw a good dispersal of styles across western Europe.

wheelertype1-1x.jpg

Wheeler, 1927 hilt typology

Geibig 1991 sword blade typology.

Type II compared to 11th century type X and Xa. M. Aleksić 2007: 193, 194.

Modified Wheeler 1935 Seax typology & Schmitt 2005 Blade typology.

illustration by Kirk Spencer

Modified Wheeler 1935 Seax typology illustration by Kirk Spencer.

Seax are a mix of tool knives and war knives that saw widespread use in the early Viking age as less expensive higher status backup weaponry; steadily falling off in favor of dual edged swords. The concept would forever live on into the medieval period proper in the form of falchions and messers.

tumblr_pcuv1eV0u41ro2bqto1_1280.jpg

New York Metropolitan Museum of Art 1917, educational charts

A. Querengasser. 2019. depiction of the Hussite war flail reconstruction in the tabor museum.

Rudof Wegeli 1939. illustrations of Mordaxt (poleaxe’s) from The Historisches Museum in Bern Switzerland.

Polearms are extremely diverse category of medieval arms making typologies difficult. If you can think of something that looked cool on the end of a stick its probably been done in some capacity.

Two handed axes almost universally developed into what we would call poleaxes / pollaxes having various combinations of spikes, hammers and blades in one weapon, often carried as primary weapons by the heaviest armored combatants such as knights.

A. Querengasser. 2019. Illustration of polearms from the Hussite Wars 15th century

Rudof Wegeli 1939. illustrations of Mordaxt (poleaxe’s) from The Historisches Museum in Bern Switzerland.

Rudof Wegeli 1939. illustrations of Mordaxt from The Historisches Museum in Bern Switzerland.

These example's are more commonly called halberds however Wegeli does not distinguish them from regular “murder axes”.

Rudof Wegeli 1939. illustrations of Mordaxt (poleaxe’s) from The Historisches Museum in Bern Switzerland.

New York Metropolitan Museum of Art 1917, educational charts

Ewart Oakeshott, 1980. late schiavona hilt typology. 17th century.

cc9c2ba141abf2b6f1a277cd7811e291.jpg

James Elmslie, 2015 single edged typology; Ewart Oakeshott, 1960 blade, guard and pommel Typology

Illustration by Peter Johnsson.

Additions to E. Oakeshott 1960. Medieval pommel typology from Southeastern Europe. M. Aleksić 2007: 25.

(D1, E1, H2, Ia, К1, Na,b, N1, Ra,b, R1a,b, T6, Z1, Z2а,b,c, Z3, Z4)

Additions to E. Oakeshott 1960. medieval sword typology from Southeastern Europe. M. Aleksić 2007: 28.

Additions to E. Oakeshott 1960. Medieval guard typology from Southeastern Europe. M. Aleksić 2007: 25.

(4a, 11a, 12a,b,c, 13). For some reason Aleksić didn’t illustrate all of his new types.

Anatoly Kirpichnikov 1966. Mace typology Rus/Ukraine 11th-13th century.

Ewart Oakeshott 1980. late medieval Mace typology.

Medieval Maces and Warhammers where a response to cut resistant armors such as gambeson and chainmail that saw prolific use in the 12th & 13th centuries. By the 14th century armour technology had mostly out paced short blunt mass weaponry however they continued to see use as non-lethal (well kind of) options for law enforcement and ransom hunting.

Battle Axes continued to be used as general purpose mass transfer weapons.

Anatoly Kirpichnikov 1966. flail typology Rus/Ukraine 10th-13th century.

E. J. Brett. 1894. Warhammer illustrations.

Asia.

Japanese 10th - 21st century

Due to resource and cultural constraints Japanese steel technology virtually stagnated from the start of their isolationism until westernization of the late 18th century. As such traditional Japanese blacksmithing techniques are a window into the past almost forgotten by the advance of metallurgy spurred by crucible steels.

Japanese Swords https://www.tf.uni-kiel.de/matwis/amat/iss/kap_b/backbone/rb_6_1.html

Michihiro Tanobe. 2021, The Beauty of the Japanese Sword, History and Traditional Technology. The Japanese Sword Museum. From the Macao Museum of Art https://www.nihonto.com/tanobe-article/

http://www.japaneseswordindex.com/nihonto.htm

Sword preservation has been a bit better in japan due to the nation holding such high regard for swords. meaning we have pretty good examples over the last 10 centuries, problem being the changes are so minor it makes a general typology difficult outside size variation.

Left & right, The Japanese Sword Museum 2021 sword types by period

 

source needed

Koshi-zori and Naka-zori are the only variations for tachi however katanas also utilize them.

http://www.japaneseswordindex.com/tsuba.htm

good example of the various kinds of blade cross sections. This image is certainly from an academic source researching metallurgy of historical swords, unfortunately i’ve failed to track down the source. if you recognize what study this image is from please contact me.

These are nomenclature diagrams for the different variations within the tachi and katana typologies. images like these are a dime a dozen and are not typically associated with archeology academic sources.